Do you know what…?
Why are developing countries paying out more on debt than new financing brings in?

AI-generated image, not a photograph. This edition's article, audio and test are AI-generated and published automatically without prior human review. Sources · Editorial & AI Policy
Listen to today’s article
The IMF–World Bank Annual Meetings, scheduled for 12–18 October 2026 in Bangkok, bring central bankers and finance ministers together with business, civil society and academics. Behind discussions of financial stability, poverty and employment lies a counterintuitive problem: new borrowing need not mean more money available to spend. The World Bank’s International Debt Report 2025 shows that developing countries collectively paid more in external-debt principal and interest than they received in new financing during 2022–2024. Published in December 2025, that evidence provides a lens for this gathering, not a measurement of debt conditions in 2026.
The mechanism is straightforward, although its consequences are not. Principal is the amount borrowed that must be repaid; interest is the charge for borrowing it. External debt is owed to creditors outside the country. When repayments and interest fresh financing, the net flow after debt service turns negative—even while new loans arrive. The striking detail: developing countries paid a record $415 billion in external-debt interest alone in 2024, according to the World Bank. That bill excludes principal repayments. For public borrowers, servicing debt can compete with other budget priorities, narrowing without revealing which particular programmes lose funding.
Yet the picture does not describe every country or creditor relationship. In 2024, the World Bank’s new financing to countries eligible for its International Development Association (IDA) exceeded their principal and interest payments to it by $18.3 billion. That contrast explains why financing institutions matter in Bangkok: an outward flow overall can coexist with an inward flow through a particular channel. The distinction is between announcing lending and providing resources after debt payments are accounted for. The forthcoming plenary, scheduled for 16 October with public livestream access, offers a point of public scrutiny—not evidence that any debt agreement has already been reached.
